Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 23.06.2025 06:23

Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
☆ what's the thing that made u fell in love with your bias?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
How does gut health affect mental well-being?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
What are some important works of Marcel Proust (novelist)?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
‘Dirty Dozen’ 2025: The 12 Most Contaminated Fruits and Vegetables - Food & Wine
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Circle IPO Is Said to Price Above Range to Raise $1.1 Billion - Bloomberg
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
The Verge’s guide to Amazon Prime Day 2025: best deals, tips, and tricks - The Verge
Just in the last 5 years:
Thank you.
What’s next?